You see, no one can fully pin point a "High Brow" movie the same year it comes out because it would come off as being "pretentious" or something like that. This is where things get complicated even more. They first come off as a movie that would either be forgotten almost a year after it has come out or, in a rare instances, gets recognized by the Academy and the like. "High Brow" movies are those kinds of movies that only become "high brow" years after they have been released to the public. I'm just saying it's associated with them.) I like a bunch of that stuff, and I'm not nearly that posh. (I'm not in any sense saying that these things are only or can only be appreciated by the upper middle class. The trappings of the upper middle class intelligentsia basically, and highbrow is whatever they say it is. But that's actually a nitpick which only turns up in fridge logic unless you're a science nerd like me.Īlthough really, I think it just means 'stuff posh people like or try to like because other posh people like them'Ī list of things that come to mind when i think 'highbrow' in general ![]() But I also think it was easily accessible to regular audiences, so I'm not really sure where these naysayers are coming from.Ĭlick to expand.Well, there was that bit where they where trying to grab onto the spacecraft and even though they came to a complete stop and thus had no more momentum to pull them away, Clooney's character still made a noble sacrifice so his (0 in that frame of reference) weight wouldn't pull them both away. In terms of this year's big winner, Gravity struck me as an exercise of technical excellence, which might mean that viewers who pay attention to the filmmaking might appreciate it more than viewers who simply watch the action on screen (people who say things like "wow, that was some great cinematography" rather than just "wow, look at that explosion"). ![]() I imagine the users you mentioned might be talking about "Oscar-bait" films, which I guess could be mistaken for "high brow" but really seem to be more "tug at the right strings of the Academy." Or maybe those users are just such "low brow" people that anything above mediocrity is considered high-brow Oscars are usually middle-brow (not that it's a bad thing). Movies that explore more complex narratives, attempt to challenge the constraints of the medium, or spend their efforts on developing themes or sending a message instead of just entertaining, tend to not be Oscar favorites. So how do you define high brow movies? Why do you think Oscar movies/historical dramas are often labeled as high brow or sophisticated? To me, movies that try to primarily hit you in the feels don't evoke an image of stuffy art house fare aimed only for sophisticated and smart people. Movies that succeed at the Oscars often appeal to emotions and they don't have particularly complex narrative structures. These films don't usually make a splash at the Oscars. When I think of movies that might be called high brow, I usually think of experimental films or movies that have otherwise challenging or unusual storytelling. I don't personally perceive most Oscar movies (Best Picture winners/nominees) as high brow. I personally disagreed and it made me wonder, how people actually define what is high brow art? There seemed to be several users who referred to Oscar movies as pretentious or something people say they watch in order to appear smart and sophisticated. ![]() I was reading the Oscar thread and something caught my eye.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |